The complete series can be read here:
Project 2025: Just Facts, No Hype
Section 1: Taking the Reins of Government
Section 3: The General Welfare
Section 5: Independent Regulatory Agencies
The section emphasizes a strong executive approach to national defense with several key priorities:
- Military Readiness
The document calls for restoring “warfighting as [the military’s] sole mission”, prioritizing combat effectiveness over social policies or non-defense matters. - Focus on China
Defeating the threat posed by the Chinese Communist Party is set as the highest priority for the military. - Officer Promotions
The section advocates for reviewing general and flag officer promotions to ensure they align with core military responsibilities rather than social engineering or non-defense matters. - Reducing Non-Military Influences
There’s a push to minimize the impact of issues like climate change, critical race theory, and other policies deemed to weaken the armed forces or discourage enlistment. - Missile Defense and Counterterrorism
While not explicitly detailed, the section implies a focus on enhancing these capabilities. - Executive Authority
The document emphasizes a strong executive role in shaping national defense policy and priorities.
This approach to national defense could significantly affect U.S. democracy in several ways:
- It may lead to a more centralized decision-making process in national security matters, potentially reducing the influence of Congress and other stakeholders.
- The focus on traditional military priorities could result in reduced emphasis on newer challenges like cybersecurity or climate-related threats.
- The strong stance against “social engineering” in the military might lead to tensions over issues of diversity and inclusion within the armed forces.
- The prioritization of China as a threat could shape U.S. foreign policy and international relations more broadly.
- The emphasis on executive authority in defense matters could potentially alter the balance of power between different branches of government.
Overall, this section proposes a more assertive, traditionally-focused approach to national defense, with potential implications for both domestic policy and international relations.